CUSTOM AI AGENTS · Product & engineering
Code revieweras part of your team.
Analyze differences. Flag concrete risks. Link findings to code lines.
Explore this agent for my team ↗01 · THE WORK, STEP BY STEP
How the task moves forward.
Agents work with project context, conventions and acceptance criteria. They prepare code, tests or documentation for the team's existing workflow.
- 01
Analyze differences
Reads the change with the context needed to understand its behavior.
- 02
Flag concrete risks
Flags concrete issues and explains when they could affect operation.
- 03
Link findings to code lines
Links comments to locations without replacing the reviewer's decision.
02 · ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
A situation that may feel familiar.
A team reviews a billing change before merging it.
Illustrative scenario, not a customer case study or measured results.
SlackExampleRead about the scope of the assignment at the team's channel.
LinearExampleIdentify real dependencies and a task that has no owner yet.
Orders area · Initial state
| Task | Labour | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBA-128 | Implement export | Hugo | To be done |
| WBA-129 | Review the change | Sara | Blocked by WBA-128 |
| WBA-130 | Validate the deliverable | Unassigned | Blocked by WBA-129 |
LinearExampleOrganize the project without inventing owners or marking pending work as complete.
Validation of order area
Not yet assigned
- ✓WBA-128 dependencies → WBA-129 → WBA-130 registered
- ✓Existing dates preserved
- ○Assign a validation owner
- ○Run validation after review
SlackExampleShare the result and distinguish prepared work from executed work.
03 · YOUR WAY OF WORKING
Fits the business you already have.
Context and tools
We start with your current documents, systems and channels. We assess feasible connections and define the permissions required for this specific task.
Improves with your feedback
Approved corrections are incorporated into instructions, examples or knowledge sources. We review changes before expanding the agent’s scope.
A clear way to evaluate
We agree on a representative sample and measure review time, errors, exceptions and output quality against the current workflow. Feasibility is decided using that evidence.
04 · COMMON QUESTIONS
Before getting started.
What information does this agent need?
Proposed changes and project conventions. We review quality, currency and access before connecting the workflow. You do not need to replace all your tools to begin.
What will my team receive?
Code review with justified observations. We agree on the format and delivery channel during setup, together with cases that need review.
Which decisions remain with people?
The team retains approval over changes, merges and deployments.
Can it coordinate with other agents?
Yes. We define what this agent hands to the next one and who handles exceptions. It can interact through Slack, WhatsApp, email or Microsoft Teams, depending on the integration and permissions we configure.
INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
Where it could fit.
RELATED AGENTS
A team that works together.
Developer agent
Reviewable change before integration or deployment.
See tasks and example ↗Product & engineeringBug triage assistant
Structured issue and technical context.
See tasks and example ↗Product & engineeringTest writer
Proposed tests with documented scope.
See tasks and example ↗START WITH ONE TASK
How would this fit your business?
Tell us how you do it today. We will define the scope, tools and controls with you.